Can Fin Homes Q2 FY27: Can Disbursements Recover After Project Tejas?
About Can Fin Homes' Q2 FY27 performance
Can Fin Homes' Q2 FY27 management commentary points to a quarter affected by the migration to its new core system, Project Tejas. According to the supplied concall highlights, the disruption temporarily reduced branch-level disbursement activity, while management maintained its full-year FY27 disbursement guidance of ₹13,000 crore.
The company expects the technology migration to support productivity and business growth over time. Its near-term challenge is to restore branch productivity, improve sourcing and convert its lending pipeline into disbursements without compromising underwriting standards or funding discipline.
The company has guided for FY27 AUM growth of 13–14%, with the outlook closer to 14%. For FY28, management is targeting disbursements of approximately ₹16,000 crore and AUM growth above 15%, closer to 15.5%. These targets indicate an ambition to accelerate growth after the transition period, but execution will be crucial.
Q2 disbursements were reported at ₹2,375 crore, net of cancellations under National Housing Bank (NHB) reporting guidelines. Management also indicated a Q3 disbursement target of around ₹3,500 crore. The extent to which the company achieves this recovery will help investors judge whether the Q2 disruption was temporary or has had a longer-lasting effect on business momentum.
Key highlights from the Q2 FY27 concall
✓ Q2 disbursements: ₹2,375 crore, net of cancellations as reported.
✓ FY27 disbursement guidance: ₹13,000 crore, maintained by management.
✓ FY27 AUM growth: 13–14%, with the outlook closer to 14%.
✓ Q3 disbursement target: Approximately ₹3,500 crore.
✓ FY28 growth ambition: Disbursements of around ₹16,000 crore and AUM growth closer to 15.5%.
✓ Project Tejas: Core-system migration completed across branches, with the full rollout effective October 1, according to the supplied notes.
✓ Margins: Spread guidance of 2.75% or higher and NIM guidance of 3.75% or higher.
✓ Funding: NHB refinance sanction of ₹1,350 crore and expected blended funding cost of around 6.6–6.7%.
✓ Asset quality: Credit-cost guidance of around 10 basis points, with the Q2 run rate reported at approximately 9 basis points.
✓ Branch and sales expansion: 25 of 28 planned FY27 branches operational, with plans to expand the sales team from around 90 to 150 people.
Project Tejas is central to understanding the quarter. The supplied commentary says disbursements at branches fell by around 70–75% during migration, before recovering to approximately 80–90% of the previous run rate in the following month. This supports management's explanation that the disruption was operational rather than necessarily evidence of weaker underlying demand.
Nevertheless, an operational explanation should be tested against subsequent data. Investors should monitor whether disbursements return to normal levels, whether applications convert into loans at the expected pace, and whether the technology system improves turnaround time and customer experience. Completion of the migration is an important milestone, but the benefits depend on how effectively employees and customers adapt to the new processes.
Track banking and housing-finance trends with disciplined market analysis.
Nifty TipCan Fin Homes: Key operating and financial indicators
| Parameter | Reported figure or guidance | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 disbursements | ₹2,375 crore | Shows lending activity during the system-migration quarter. |
| FY27 disbursement guidance | ₹13,000 crore | Maintained full-year target requiring stronger activity in subsequent quarters. |
| FY27 AUM growth | 13–14% | Indicates the expected expansion in the outstanding loan portfolio. |
| Spread / NIM guidance | 2.75%+ / 3.75%+ | Measures the intended lending margin and interest profitability. |
| Blended funding cost | Approximately 6.6–6.7% | Funding cost influences the margin earned on loans. |
| Credit cost | Around 9 bps in Q2; guidance around 10 bps | Indicates the expected cost of loan losses, subject to the company's calculation method. |
| FY28 disbursement plan | Approximately ₹16,000 crore | Signals an ambition to increase lending activity in the following financial year. |
Source note: Figures and management expectations are reproduced from the supplied concall highlights and have not been independently verified against the original transcript.
Funding costs will remain an important variable. The company reported an NHB refinance sanction of ₹1,350 crore, expected blended funding costs of approximately 6.6–6.7%, and around ₹2,500 crore in available undrawn sanctions. Management is prioritising cost-effective borrowings over relatively expensive non-convertible debentures (NCDs), according to the supplied notes.
The liability mix also matters. Around 65% of liabilities are reported to be floating-rate, making funding costs sensitive to changes in policy rates and benchmark rates. The company has increased housing-loan rates by 10 basis points, effective October 8, as stated in the supplied information. The effect on spreads will depend on how quickly asset yields and borrowing costs adjust relative to one another.
Strengths
✓ FY27 disbursement guidance of ₹13,000 crore has been maintained.
✓ Management expects AUM growth of 13–14% in FY27.
✓ Core-system migration has reportedly been completed across branches.
✓ Spread and NIM guidance remain at 2.75%+ and 3.75+%, respectively.
✓ Reported Q2 credit cost of approximately 9 basis points is close to the stated guidance.
Weaknesses
⚠ Q2 disbursements were affected by the core-system migration.
⚠ Branch activity had not fully returned to the previous run rate in the recovery period described.
⚠ Prepayments declined from July to August and September, according to management's commentary.
⚠ Floating-rate liabilities expose funding costs to benchmark-rate changes.
⚠ The timing of agricultural or other provisioning benefits should not be assumed without supporting disclosures.
Prepayments are another important factor for a housing finance company. Q2 prepayments were reported at ₹1,795 crore, compared with ₹1,857 crore in Q1. Monthly prepayments declined from ₹655 crore in July to below ₹600 crore in both August and September. Management believes narrowing differences in lending rates could improve customer retention, but this remains an expectation that needs to be confirmed by future data.
The company also reported a ₹35 crore increase in gross non-performing assets (GNPA) during the first half, compared with ₹40 crore in the corresponding period of the previous year. Management expects GNPA to improve in H2. The actual trend in overdue accounts, slippages, recoveries and write-offs will be important in determining whether that improvement occurs.
A slight increase in SMA-0 accounts was attributed partly to the new system's daily overdue-recognition method. SMA-0 generally refers to accounts showing early signs of overdue payment, within the applicable classification framework. A change in recognition practices can affect reported trends, so investors should distinguish system-related classification effects from any genuine deterioration in borrower repayment behaviour.
Opportunities
↗ Normalisation after Project Tejas may restore branch productivity.
↗ Digital sourcing and improved customer journeys could support loan origination.
↗ Expansion of the sales team from around 90 to 150 people may increase sourcing capacity.
↗ The planned FY27 branch expansion could widen the company's reach.
↗ Lower-cost funding and better customer retention may support margins and AUM growth.
Threats
⚠ Disbursements may recover more slowly than management expects.
⚠ Competition and refinancing conditions could put pressure on lending spreads.
⚠ Higher funding costs may offset gains from increased housing-loan rates.
⚠ Weaker customer retention or higher prepayments could constrain AUM growth.
⚠ Asset quality could deteriorate if economic conditions weaken or early delinquencies increase.
Project Tejas is also expected to release approximately 129 employees who were deployed in migration, testing and training for redeployment to business and support functions. Alongside the planned increase in sales staff, this may help restore sourcing capacity. However, the contribution will depend on training, role allocation, technology stability and the ability to convert leads into completed disbursements.
Valuation and investment view: what should investors monitor?
The supplied concall summary does not include a current share price, valuation multiple or earnings forecast. It is therefore insufficient on its own to establish whether Can Fin Homes shares are undervalued or overvalued.
Investors should first monitor whether Q3 disbursements approach the stated ₹3,500 crore target and whether full-year disbursements remain on track for ₹13,000 crore. Branch-level activity, sales-team productivity and the conversion of loan applications into disbursements will provide evidence of recovery after Project Tejas.
Second, investors should track spread and NIM against the stated guidance, while monitoring the blended funding cost and the impact of floating-rate liabilities. Third, asset-quality indicators—including GNPA, early delinquencies, credit costs and prepayments—will help determine whether growth is being achieved without compromising portfolio quality.
The longer-term FY28 targets of around ₹16,000 crore in disbursements and AUM growth closer to 15.5% indicate management's ambition, but delivery will depend on execution and market conditions. Investors should assess the actual results against these targets and consider valuation, capital adequacy and risks before making decisions.
Investor Takeaway
Derivative Pro & Nifty Expert Gulshan Khera, CFP®, who is also a SEBI Regd Investment Adviser, observes that Can Fin Homes' Q2 FY27 outlook depends heavily on restoring normal disbursement activity after Project Tejas. Maintaining ₹13,000 crore in FY27 disbursement guidance and targeting 13–14% AUM growth indicate management's confidence, but Q3 execution will be the immediate test. Investors should also watch funding costs, NIM, prepayments and asset-quality trends to determine whether the expected recovery is translating into sustainable growth. Read more market education at Indian-Share-Tips.com. For enquiries, call 9988877963.
Related Queries on Can Fin Homes Q2 FY27
1. What were Can Fin Homes' Q2 FY27 disbursements?
The supplied concall highlights report disbursements of ₹2,375 crore, net of cancellations under NHB reporting guidelines.
2. What is Can Fin Homes' FY27 disbursement target?
Management has maintained guidance of ₹13,000 crore, according to the supplied information.
3. What is Project Tejas?
Project Tejas is the company's core-system migration initiative. The supplied notes say the migration was completed across branches, with full rollout effective October 1.
4. What are Can Fin Homes' spread and NIM targets?
The supplied summary reports spread guidance of 2.75% or higher and NIM guidance of 3.75% or higher.
5. What is the company's credit-cost outlook?
Management expects normalized credit costs of around 10 basis points, while the Q2 run rate was reported at approximately 9 basis points.
6. What should investors watch in H2 FY27?
Key monitorables include disbursement recovery, branch productivity, deposit and borrowing costs, prepayments, GNPA trends and progress towards the FY27 AUM growth target.
SEBI Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice, a recommendation to buy or sell securities, or a guarantee of returns. Figures and forward-looking statements are based on the supplied concall highlights and have not been independently verified against the original transcript. Readers should conduct independent research and consult an appropriately qualified professional where necessary. Market investments are subject to risk.
Written by Indian-Share-Tips.com, which is a SEBI Registered Advisory Services.











